Re: [xsl] •

> But I think I do if I want to make it so that this entity, and quite 
> a few other numeric entities, survive the transform to html for later 
> posting. Otherwise I get "*" in my html code rather than "&8226;" 
> which displays like this "â¤¢".

No.\see the FAQ. It only displays like that if your browser is set up
incorrectly and is not understanding utf-8 encoding. If that is so
then just ouput in latin 1 by using
<xsl:output encoding="iso-8859-1"/>
then characters that are not in latin 1 will be output using character
references. 


David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] •, (continued) Thomas B. Passin - Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:09:15 -0400 J.Pietschmann - Sat, 08 Jun 2002 20:13:42 +0200 Mike Brown - Sat, 8 Jun 2002 12:43:57 -0600 (MDT) Greg Martel - Sat, 8 Jun 2002 14:39:50 -0500 (CDT) David Carlisle - Sat, 8 Jun 2002 20:30:32 +0100 <= Michael Kay - Sun, 9 Jun 2002 16:30:51 +0100 David Carlisle - Sat, 8 Jun 2002 20:28:02 +0100 Allen Chu - Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:12:19 -0400 Jeni Tennison - Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:46:18 +0100

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] •, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] •, Greg Martel	Thread	RE: [xsl] •, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] •, David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] •, David Carlisle
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] &#8226;

Re: [xsl] •