Subject: Re: [xsl] Best practices From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:27:50 +0100 |
> what is the "defacto" way to test for an empty > element? if by empty you mean no children then the most obvious way (if the element is the current node) is <xsl:if test="not(node())"> you can also test <xsl:if test=".=''"> but that would say that <a><b/></a> was empty. If by empty you mean no element children then <xsl:if test="not(*)"> David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Best practices, CROFT, MICHAEL | Thread | RE: [xsl] Best practices, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] RE: how I can select the , Bodrul Haque | Date | RE: [xsl] Template priority, Hunsberger, Peter |
Month |