Subject: RE: [xsl] Best practices From: "CROFT, MICHAEL" <MCROFT@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:36:42 -0400 |
Thanks David, All your answers have worked perfectly, and thanks for providing various ways to get the task done! -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:28 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Best practices > what is the "defacto" way to test for an empty > element? if by empty you mean no children then the most obvious way (if the element is the current node) is <xsl:if test="not(node())"> you can also test <xsl:if test=".=''"> but that would say that <a><b/></a> was empty. If by empty you mean no element children then <xsl:if test="not(*)"> David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and postmaster@xxxxxxxxxx ********************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Best practices, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Best practices, CROFT, MICHAEL |
RE: [xsl] Template priority, Hunsberger, Peter | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: ( Re: [xsl] RE: how I, David Carlisle |
Month |