Subject: Re: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bound XML? From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 11:29:27 +0100 |
well now we have mathml, because xml no fun with numbers, kids. so this brings us to 'mxxssfhcr', hmm a distinct lack of vowels, any scrabble experts out there ? cheers, jim fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:07 AM Subject: RE: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bound XML? > > Jim Fuller wrote: > >xsxsfhcr ? > > uh, how would one pronounce that? :) > > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bou, bryan | Thread | [xsl] Changes data on the fly, Charles Ohana |
RE: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bou, bryan | Date | Re: [xsl] fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper, David Tolpin |
Month |