Subject: Re: [xsl] processing-instruction() From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:48:39 +0100 |
David C. wrote: > Other than that it looks OK except > > <xsl:template match="node()"> > and > <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('Eqn')"> > > have the same default priority so you want to add priority="10" to > the processing-instruction ones. Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority of -0.5: ... * If the pattern has the form of a QName preceded by a ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier *or has the form processing-instruction(Literal)* preceded by a ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is 0. ... * Otherwise, if the pattern consists of just a NodeTest preceded by a ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is -0.5. ... http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#conflict (my emphasis) Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Joerg Heinicke |
Re: [xsl] math get maximum and subt, sascha | Date | RE: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Jiang, Peiyun |
Month |