|
Subject: Re: [xsl] processing-instruction() From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:48:39 +0100 |
David C. wrote:
> Other than that it looks OK except
>
> <xsl:template match="node()">
> and
> <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('Eqn')">
>
> have the same default priority so you want to add priority="10" to
> the processing-instruction ones.
Actually, I think the processing-instruction('Eqn') matching template
has a priority of 0 while the node() matching template has a priority
of -0.5:
...
* If the pattern has the form of a QName preceded by a
ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier *or has the form
processing-instruction(Literal)* preceded by a
ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is 0.
...
* Otherwise, if the pattern consists of just a NodeTest preceded
by a ChildOrAttributeAxisSpecifier, then the priority is -0.5.
...
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#conflict (my emphasis)
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Joerg Heinicke |
| Re: [xsl] math get maximum and subt, sascha | Date | RE: [xsl] processing-instruction(), Jiang, Peiyun |
| Month |