Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard From: "Carsten Klein" <carstenklein@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:06:55 +0200 |
Hi, your point about documenting xsl is quite reasonable. But why don't you fall back to existing standards, like rdf for example? It is meant for documenting code and nearly everything else. Since it is in the rdf namespace, extracting the documentation from a stylesheet is more easily handled by processing merely the rdf namespace and you may have html and other namespaces in it, too, without the need to write too much logic when it comes to extracting the information from the stylesheet for further processing. I was about to use rdf in a project of mine. What do you think about rdf used in conjunction with documenting stylesheets or even xml documents? Is it too much overhead for the mere purpose of documenting a stylesheet or is it resonable to do so? Bye Carsten XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard, Steve Ball |
[xsl] incrementing a variable, John Moylan | Date | Re: [xsl] incrementing a variable, Carsten Klein |
Month |