Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: xsl/xslt coding standard From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:31:37 +0100 |
Hi Conal, > What about just using custom attributes rather than comment > elements? It means your documentation is not arbitrarily structured, > but it can at least have a structure that matches the stylesheet > itself, without interfering too much with the output tree. That's a reasonable idea, though you can't use it to add documentation to literal result elements (without the documentation being added to the element in the result). I think I'd still find the ability to structure my comments useful, though, mainly for indicating the meaning of particular words. For example: <xsl:for-each select="blah-child[@type="$blah-type]"> <xsl:doc> iterate over the <el>blah-child</el> whose <at>type</at> is the same as the <param>blah-type</param> </xsl:doc> ... </xsl:for-each> Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: xsl/xslt coding stand, Conal Tuohy | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: xsl/xslt coding stand, "Braumüller, Hans" |
Re: [xsl] xsl/xslt coding standard, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: RE: [xsl] DOM and XML parser, ashu t |
Month |