RE: [xsl] generalized unique element

Subject: RE: [xsl] generalized unique element
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:09:07 +0100
> Mike> It all gets easier in XPath 2.0, where you can write
> Mike> 
> Mike> <xsl:if test="every $x in preceding-sibling::*
> Mike>               satisfies name($x) != name(.)">
> 
> Are you _sure_ that's easier than
> 
> <xsl:if test="preceding-sibling::*[name(.)=name(current())]">
> 

Well, I can't say it's a simpler solution; but in my case, this
afternoon, it was a solution that I found more easily.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread