Subject: Re[2]: [xsl] binary-or From: Rubén <rubenm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:42:19 +0200 |
I must stick to XPath 1.1 for the moment, but it's good to know that. Thank you! ============================== Original Message ============================== From: Rubén To: Michael Kay Date: Thursday, September 26, 2002, 12:42:59 PM Subject: [xsl] binary-or > Hello list! I couldn't find a "binary-or" (or "mask-or") > operation in XPath 1.1 so I tried to emulate it with a > template. I wrote a recursive implementation but I'm not very > happy with the result. I wonder if there is a simpler (and > maybe more efficient) solution. Any suggestions? > You could use a sequence-of-booleans in XPath 2.0.... Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list =========================== End Of Original Message ========================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] binary-or, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] binary-or, Rubén |
[xsl] Re: Selecting a random node f, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re[2]: [xsl] binary-or, Rubén |
Month |