Subject: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT? From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustafl@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:53:09 +0200 |
This is probably a FAQ, but I haven't found the answer. I've been doing some background research on XSLT as a programming language. Now I have grasped the concepts of declarative programming, but there's one important question left: what is the advantages of having XSLT expressed in XML syntax? Even if we like XML, it's a quite verbose syntax for programming. Have there been any attempts on making an abbreviated form of XSLT, like the abbreviated form of RELAX NG, to make it look more like other programming languages? I mean keep the concepts of declarative programming, just change the syntax. Would such work be fruitful and welcome? Gustaf XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] pesky & and fop, J.Pietschmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, G. Ken Holman |
[xsl] pesky & and fop, eoin walsh | Date | Re: [xsl] Using document(), David Carlisle |
Month |