Subject: RE: [xsl] Arguments for XSL From: "Lee V" <ld_griff77@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:22:01 -0500 |
I think it may be time to show everybody exactly what can be done with your system. Get a few style sheets together (one for full details, maybe one for headings only.. whatever). You know; show off. -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Micallef Sent: October 17, 2002 8:16 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] Arguments for XSL Hi All, I've spent considerable time setting up an architecture using XML and XSL in order to produce a help-system for one of our software products. I feel using this system is much better than using a WYSIWYG editor because it allows the writer to concentrate on content and not on formatting. Formatting can be done by a different person or at a different time via XSL style-sheets. I've pitched this idea to my manager and he likes it but when we sent the whole package of to our head-office abroad for translation into different languages, they didn't like it. They prefer using a WYSIWYG editor (specifically ROBOHELP). My gut feel is XML is better even tho a WYSIWYG editor allows you to see results immediately without compiling or anything. Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Am I right or wrong? If so, why? Thanks for your help, Mark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Antonio Gallardo Riv | Thread | RE: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Mike Ferrando |
[xsl] check if a node is empty, jeremyf | Date | RE: [xsl] check if a node is empty, Macaulay,Malcolm (US |
Month |