Subject: RE: [xsl] Arguments for XSL From: sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:10:26 -0400 |
Well, I would say you're both right. Moving to XML where authors don't control the formatting *does* help writers focus on content and it's amazingly liberating. But being a writer, I do understand wanting something sort of WYSIWYG -- some level of feedback helps the writing process. So, as others have suggested, give it to them in something like XMetal, Frame 7, or Epic. All three products do a good job of supporting the fundamental realities of both XML *and* writing. Most of the other XML Editors I've seen don't do this well, Sara XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Olivier Collioud | Thread | RE: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, KIENLE, STEVEN C [IT |
RE: [xsl] Inheriting an attribute f, James Carlyle | Date | [xsl] Is it possible to know positi, evgeniy . strokin |
Month |