Subject: [xsl] Re: Top n values From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 04:23:25 -0700 (PDT) |
> Hi Vasu, > > Yes, he could do it like that, but why? Why resort to extensions and > build a RTF, when he could just sort by item and filter by position - > why make things the hard way? > > Cheers, > > Jarno Because this is not acomplete and correct solution -- this will work only if all values are different. In case we have to select all elements, whose value is among the first n, then we cannot use position(), because we do not know how many nodes have a particular value. In this case we must be able to compare a node from the sorted nodelist with other nodes -- I do not see how this can be done without first producing an RTF with the sorted nodes, then converting it to node-set with the xxx:node-set() function and only then accessing the nodes in the (new) document order. ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Top n values, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Depth of an XML f, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] What is the fastest XSLT pars, Thomas V. Nielsen | Date | Re: Functional Language wasRE: [xsl, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |