Subject: RE: [xsl] Max size? From: "Martinez, Brian" <brian.martinez@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:26:37 -0700 |
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:57 PM > Subject: Re: [xsl] Max size? > > > Michael Kay wrote: > > In the longer term I'm sure we will see XSLT processors > that access XML > > databases natively rather than relying on the input tree being in > > primary memory: this is one reason why the synergy between XSLT and > > XQuery is so important. > > The next version of MS Windows will have an RDBMS based file system. > > Your note raises the interesting perspective that in some years OS > might use mixed XML/RDBMS natively instead of a classic file system > for storing all kinds of information, in particular mail, documents, > spreadsheets and presentations. > > What opportunities would arise from this? Would the benefits outweight > the cost? I can envision the help desk calls already: "I'm sorry, ma'am, you can't just type 'dir' anymore, you have to use 'saxon -o STD_OUT c:\ dir.xslt'" ;-) b. | brian martinez brian.martinez@xxxxxxxx | | senior gui programmer 303.708.7248 | | trip network, inc. fax 303.790.9350 | | 6436 s. racine cir. englewood, co 80111 | | http://www.cheaptickets.com/ http://www.trip.com/ | XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Max size?, Edward . Middleton | Thread | RE: [xsl] Max size?, Américo Albuquerque |
Re: [xsl] Max size?, J.Pietschmann | Date | [xsl] xsl-filters pipeline2, Errea Alexandra |
Month |