Subject: RE: [xsl] N : M transformation From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:29:08 -0000 |
> exsl:document seems to be the best solution. Is there any reson why > Saxon doesn't support it? (other than time constraints and the like) > The semantics of exsl:document aren't identical to those of the facility implemented in Saxon 6.5.2, and I had already caused enough confusion with different names and definitions of the instruction without adding more. Also, I think that by the time it was specified, I had pretty well frozen the 6.x line except for bug fixing. In 7.x my priority is to implement standard XSLT 2.0 features. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif | Thread | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif |
[xsl] Problem constructing table in, Mukul | Date | Re: [xsl] Problem constructing tabl, G. Ken Holman |
Month |