Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:40:43 -0500 |
Actually it's probably just as well that participating in the standards process is so expensive (more in time and expenses than in W3C membership fees, incidentally). If more people took part, the process would take even longer, and the specs would be even more complicated.
-- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton DataPower Technology, Inc.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif |
RE: [xsl] get the first of the fol, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay |
Month |