Subject: RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:26:07 -0000 |
> If it's true that $s rules the development of the specs (XSLT > etc) more > than anything else, then that's a very sad state of affairs IMHO. > Actually it's probably just as well that participating in the standards process is so expensive (more in time and expenses than in W3C membership fees, incidentally). If more people took part, the process would take even longer, and the specs would be even more complicated. But since participation does take a lot of time and effort, I think it's inevitable that the process is biased towards the views of the people who invest that time and effort. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Jeff Kenton |
RE: [xsl] get the first of the fol, cknell | Date | RE: [xsl] get the first of the fol, Michael Kay |
Month |