Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:02:17 -0500 |
Actually, as we get closer to finishing, I'm getting more and more convinced that people will find the stronger typing useful, although I was very sceptical when we started. Yes, XML Schema is a pig, but it turns out you can live with it if you avoid looking at it too closely, and that is what large numbers of people are in fact doing.
--- www.simonwoodside.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle |
Month |