Subject: RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:42:16 -0500 |
The key is to not just say "It's too difficult;" but to say "I think this section/point/feature is asking too much of developers and is likely to prevent adoption of the new standard in new versions of XSLT processors." Back it up with constructive critiques and the standard can actually be affected; just screaming "I can't do that; I give up!" and the specs remains.
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif | Thread | RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] get the first of the fol, Wendell Piez |
Month |