Subject: RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 23:49:08 -0000 |
> If a conforming XSLT processor can output "hello world" given > any input as it always constructs the same PSVI tree given > any document then how can you ever do any conformance testing? One suggestion for conformance testing (not as silly as it seems) is that you should construct the source data model using XSLT. That way, it's well defined what data model you get from a given input. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Variable or Query for Spe, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Caching source document as an, Al Byers |
Month |