Subject: RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:36:06 -0500 |
One suggestion for conformance testing (not as silly as it seems) is that you should construct the source data model using XSLT. That way, it's well defined what data model you get from a given input.
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Re: [xsl] Caching source document a, Joseph Kesselman | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:output/@indent="yes" , David Carlisle |
Month |