Subject: Re: [xsl] Simple Question concerning [last()] From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:12:19 GMT |
> I thought the XPath ".//x[last()] should return the last x-Element in > document order. the last descendent would be ./descendent::x[last()] or (.//x)[last()] .//x is ./descendent-or-self::node()/x so ./x[last()] is ./descendent-or-self::node()/x[last()] and selects every x that is the last x child of its parent. > Changing the selection to > ".//x[2] returns nothing at all! That selects evy x that is teh second x child of its parent. > Is this a bug in the mentioned XSLT processors or have I missed something? the latter. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Simple Question concerning [l, Stefan . Wachter | Thread | Re: [xsl] Simple Question concerni, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Simple Question concerning [l, Stefan . Wachter | Date | Re: [xsl] Simple Question concerni, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |