Subject: RE: [xsl] node-setting() escaped text From: "Marty McKeever" <marty.mckeever@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:19:03 -0500 |
> PS. If HTML is well-formed for sure, what's the reason for it to > be escaped? I'm still scratching my head over that one. They guys who setup our CMS made the decision, probably because they thought parsing the DOM would be too costly. I know that parsing it out on each request is not a viable option, so my original question is rather moot, and we'll have to jump through some object caching hoops to finally figure this one out. What the hell were they thinking... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] node-setting() escaped te, Oleg Tkachenko | Thread | RE: [xsl] node-setting() escaped te, Michael Kay |
Re: data protocol: was RE: [xsl] no, David Carlisle | Date | RE: data protocol: was RE: [xsl] no, Marty McKeever |
Month |