Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved. From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:25:03 -0000 |
> > > > It's a bicycle-shed issue. The committee spent hours wrangling and > > agreed on a messy compromise that satisfies no-one. > > Why, for what pressing reason, had this to be put in the > specification? > > What are the use-cases, whose solution depends significantly > on this feature? Some people regard the ability to have two variables with the same name as a feature that needs to be justified. Some people regard the inability to have two variables with the same name as a restriction that needs to be justified. The latter group won. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Reference to variable can, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Reference to vari, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] [XSLT2] setting context i, Michael Kay |
Month |