Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved. From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:43:50 +0100 |
"Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:000a01c2d4e4$e2b61150$6401a8c0@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > It's a bicycle-shed issue. The committee spent hours wrangling and > > > agreed on a messy compromise that satisfies no-one. > > > > Why, for what pressing reason, had this to be put in the > > specification? > > > > What are the use-cases, whose solution depends significantly > > on this feature? > > Some people regard the ability to have two variables with the same name > as a feature that needs to be justified. > > Some people regard the inability to have two variables with the same > name as a restriction that needs to be justified. > > The latter group won. Thank you Mike for explaining how decisions are taken in the committee. Shall I conclude that there were no user requirements and use-cases that required taking this decision? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Reference to variable, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Reference to vari, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Re: Re: Re: Reference to vari, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] XSLT 2 and Invalid documents, Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Month |