Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0 From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:14:15 -0000 |
> I would think that if you set your > version to 1.0, it would support only 1.0 elements, and not > provide the other functionality available in 2.0 specs. It > seems to me a better solution would be another kind of > switch, like, XPath = "1.0" and XPath = "2.0" within the > stylesheet element. That's one viewpoint, and the XSL WG hasn't yet made a decision on this. However, if you want to write a stylesheet that can run under both 1.0 and 2.0 processors, then it has to be a legal XSLT 1.0 stylesheet, and a stylesheet that contained the attribute XPath="1.0" would not be. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type, Charles White | Thread | [xsl] PHP users to test light-weigh, Terence Kearns |
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sud, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] variable scope and test d, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |