Subject: Re: [xsl] replace jsp with xsl's From: florian <csshsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 22 Feb 2003 15:54:31 +0100 |
hi! i dont think there is a big need for alot of documentation on strutcx. when you skip through the code a bit its actually pretty easy to understand.. plus there is the api page for all the classes.. ciao! florian > Exactly - I feel the sameway too! > No documentation and very less insight as to whats going on. I am also > struggling with it. I hoped maybe you have some idea about it :-) > > Ritu Kama > Sarvega Inc > 745, McLintock Dr > Burr Ridge > IL - 60527 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Guy McArthur" <guym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:09 PM > Subject: Re: [xsl] replace jsp with xsl's > > > > Ritu wrote: > > > > >Have you seen StrutsCX http://it.cappuccinonet.com/strutscx/index.php > > > > > > > ^^^ > > Looks like they're not eating their own dogfood, not yet anyways. :-) It > > sounds promising, not much documentation though. > > > > > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] replace jsp with xsl's, Ritu | Thread | Re: [xsl] replace jsp with xsl's, Ritu |
RE: [xsl] Hash-Table in xsl?, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XMLPipe model: should we , Paul Brown |
Month |