Subject: Re: [xsl] XMLPipe model: should we change the name? From: Michael Pediaditakis <mp49@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:09:33 +0000 |
E.g. if we have a tranformation that handled an <import> element (with functionality similar to XML Inclusions) and we have other tranformations that might generate additional <import> elements. In that case a simple static pipeline is not sufficient.
<document> <someData>Data1</someData> <import ref="url1"/> </document>
where "url1" is an XML document with the following information <someData>Data2</someData>
If we use the following (which is the reasonable way to do it, methinks) Import transformation SomeData transformation
the final result will be something in terms of: <document> <import ref="url2"/> <data2FinalRepresentation/> </document>
<document> <import ref="url2"/> <data2FinalRepresentation/> </document>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XMLPipe model: should we , Michael Pediaditakis | Thread | Re: [xsl] XMLPipe model: should we , S Woodside |
Re: [xsl] replace jsp with xsl's, Ritu | Date | [xsl] Matching Templates, Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |