Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0 From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 05:35:25 -0800 (PST) |
> >http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#d5e7759 > >The WD Spec contains the first of the above examples. The second was > >added by me, because it is perfectly legal now, according to the > >current WD Spec. > > from reading the spec I don't think that these > > > ><xsl:variable name="x" select="0"/> > > > > ><xsl:variable name="x" select="3"/> > > > > <xsl:variable name="x" select="$x + 2"/> > > are legal I know that it seems unbelievable, but they *are* legal, exactly according to the spec: ... "It is also not an error if a binding established by a local xsl:variable or xsl:param element shadows another binding established by another local xsl:variable or xsl:param. " And in the previous threads Mike Kay explained that according to the current spec these are legal. > can you point me to the part in the spec where that is allowed? If > that's right I'm gonna have to take the day off to go indulge in heavy > drugs. This is exactly how I felt when first encountered this new XSLT 2.0 feature. ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sud, bryan | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: The Perils of Sud, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Get value from external f, Mike Brown | Date | RE: [xsl] Get value from external f, Anders Svensson |
Month |