Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0 From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:38:26 +0000 |
I think the suggestion that the date and time functions could go out ofI'd be interested in mplementing XSD structural type information as a separate module (as outlined at http://www.redrice.com/xml/LocallyLinkedInfosets.html, building on the typetagger partially implemented at http://www.schemavalid.com/utils/typeTagger.zip) - taking it out of the XPath 2.0 may sound radical but I think it could be a very practical proposal.
the core, and into a separate namespace, on the basis that they could be
implemented in an XQuery or XSLT module, might be quite well received in
some quarters - especially if you supplied an implementation!
-- "Never mind manoeuvre, go straight at 'em." - Admiral Horatio Nelson
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sud, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sud, Kurt Cagle |
RE: xslt core and intuition was RE:, Trevor Jenkins | Date | Re: [xsl] sum() on search criteria, Jeni Tennison |
Month |