Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XSLT 2.0 From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 23:15:54 -0000 |
> >> As type-safety is pretty much a concession to Microsoft anyway > > >This is rapidly becoming an urban myth, and it is rubbish. I > won't try > to state Microsoft's position for them, but a change as > significant as this cannot be made if only one member > organisation supports it, and that is certainly not the case > in this instance. > > Now I'm probably as pro-Microsoft as it is possible to get > without actively conjuring up Satan and working a deal but I > must say that I had the impression that Microsoft would like > the type-safety, XSDL integration etc. and that they would be > active proponents of it. I did not say Microsoft weren't in favour of it. But they aren't the only ones, nor are they driving this change. And I think Microsoft are probably as well aware as anyone that what is right for XQuery is not necessarily right for XSLT. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] OMR Mark for folding mach, Michael Kay |
[xsl] XML Elements Tag (lable) Name, amit.parikh | Date | [xsl] embedded xslt with xsl:includ, Joe Meree |
Month |