Subject: RE: [xsl] thoroughly confused about node() matching From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:41:46 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Lars Huttar wrote: > > > As you point out, though, the spec > > > disagrees with Kay about child::node() matching namespace > > > nodes. Maybe the spec writers forgot about namespace nodes > > > when they wrote that?? > > > > > > > If I recall correctly (I haven't got the information to hand) this > > omission is corrected in the XSLT 1.0 errata. > > In http://www.w3.org/1999/11/REC-xslt-19991116-errata/ > which as far as I could tell gives the most current errata, > there is no correction of the above statement (Sec. 5.2, > 9th bullet). i just *know* this is going to get me in trouble, but after all the discussion of nodes and matching, have we actually concluded what the actual rules are, and where they might be available on the net in easily-digestible form? rday XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] thoroughly confused about, Lars Huttar | Thread | [xsl] Re: thoroughly confused about, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Re: Creating a XSL to ret, Robert P. J. Day | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Creating a XSL to ret, J.Pietschmann |
Month |