RE: [xsl] data vs. xml

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] data vs. xml

Subject: RE: [xsl] data vs. xml
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:50:27 +0100

> should be considered CDATA.
SGML has CDATA elements but XML has no such concept, so when you say
"should be considered CDATA" then the question is what do you mean if
you are using XML? The input document you showed is not well formed so
would have a fatal error from an XML parser before XSLT starts, so
clearly you can not do anything from within XSLT to process that.

David

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] data vs. xml, (continued) Lars Huttar - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:45:25 -0600 Passin, Tom - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:32:34 -0500 Avula, Raj - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:43:43 -0800 bix xslt - Thu, 03 Apr 2003 17:54:08 +0000 David Carlisle - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:50:27 +0100 <= bix_xslt - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 07:45:34 -0600 David Carlisle - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:09:43 +0100 Michael Kay - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:15:05 +0100 Mike Brown - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:51:45 -0700 (MST)

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] data vs. xml, (continued)
- Lars Huttar - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:45:25 -0600
- Passin, Tom - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:32:34 -0500
- Avula, Raj - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:43:43 -0800
- bix xslt - Thu, 03 Apr 2003 17:54:08 +0000
  - David Carlisle - Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:50:27 +0100 <=
    - bix_xslt - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 07:45:34 -0600
    - David Carlisle - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:09:43 +0100
    - Michael Kay - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:15:05 +0100
    - Mike Brown - Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:51:45 -0700 (MST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] data vs. xml, bix xslt	Thread	Re: [xsl] data vs. xml, bix_xslt
Re: [xsl] xml validation URGENT UR, J.Pietschmann	Date	Re: [xsl] formatting of identity tr, David Carlisle
	Month