Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt2 grouping From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:47:45 +0100 |
Andrew said: > No, I wouldn't expect them to be considered duplicates. > > The XPath 2.0 spec indicates that each node has its own node > identity. So, > since these nodes each has a separate identity they are not, > in my view at > least, duplicates. I think DC is right, its just on the stated group-by property. So I was wrong in assuming duplicates are removed! regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt2 grouping, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt2 grouping, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] template match for subele, Kathy Burke | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt2 grouping, David Carlisle |
Month |