Re: [xsl] Re: document not there ambiguity

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: document not there ambiguity
From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 02:42:16 +0200
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:57:51PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> If you dig deeper you'll uncover a lot more problems with document(),
> both for users and implementors. For example, accessing the URL might
> have side effects in the server, and some people want to access the URL

  The people who still don't understand that GET should not have
side effects deserve to have failing code, failing business and
get back to reading specs.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread