Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: document not there ambiguity From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:19:36 -0700 |
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl- > list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Veillard > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:57:51PM +0200, J.Pietschmann wrote: > > If you dig deeper you'll uncover a lot more problems with document(), > > both for users and implementors. For example, accessing the URL might > > have side effects in the server, and some people want to access the URL > > The people who still don't understand that GET should not have > side effects deserve to have failing code, failing business and > get back to reading specs. Sorry for misunderstanding.., but are you saying that people who use the document() are idiots? Are you saying the people who say '*never* use document,' are idiots? Are you just saying that you need to control what happens with the uri resolution? Curious, -Rob > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: document not there am, Daniel Veillard | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: document not there am, J.Pietschmann |
Re: [xsl] Re: document not there am, Daniel Veillard | Date | RE: [xsl] Need to use generate-id(), Sundar Shanmugasunda |
Month |