RE: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process?

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process?
From: "Americo Albuquerque" <aalbuquerque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 23:18:52 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Mitch Amiano
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 8:54 PM
> To: xsl-list
> Subject: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process?
> I've observed a team of developers using XSLT as a build tool 
> to generate C++ code, instead of using the UML tool that had 
> been selected for them (Rhapsody). They modelled various 
> aspects of the problem domain using XML, and used XSLT 
> templates to pump out C++.
> Reasons for their decision to go down this path included the 
> precise control they could exercise over the code generation 
> framework and hence the generated code, the ease of revising 
> the XML inputs and XSLT templates, and the seamless fit with 
> their Unix based ClearCase configuration management and 
> "make" based build scripts.
> How common is this approach? Anyone else have experience 
> long-term applying a similar approach?

I use xslt to make statistic calculations, I use it as a framework for
creating webpages on the fly and I use it as a report generator utility.

> - Mitch 
>  XSL-List info and archive:

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread