Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath: following sibling/cousin n-times removed?? From: "Lars Huttar" <lars_huttar@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:28:29 -0500 |
Never mind... I decided to use test="generate-id(.) = generate-id(ancestor::llcd:word//llcd:morpheme[1])" which of course tells whether the current morpheme is the first in the current word, instead of the last, which is just as useful in this situation. And I think it's more efficient than what I had before. It's certainly shorter and seems clearer. (Other ideas are still welcome though.) Lars > My current test is: > "following::llcd:morpheme[1][generate-id(ancestor::llcd:word) = > generate-id(current()/ancestor::llcd:word[1])]" XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XPath: following sibling/cous, Lars Huttar | Thread | [xsl] xsl:copy-of misuse?, Holbrook, R Cody (Co |
RE: [xsl] XPath: better way to chec, Passin, Tom | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl fo - problem opening , J.Pietschmann |
Month |