<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0

Subject: RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0
From: Andrew Watt <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:15:34 +0100
At 09:28 16/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
> I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT,

Careful Kurt, Mike Kay will accuse you of talking rubbish!

Dave,

Inadvertently, I am sure, you omitted what Kurt went on to say. I quote it here for your convenience:

>I still contend that type doesn't belong in XSLT, but if it is in there, it
>should make processes more efficient, not less. If type needs to be there,
>then all of XSD should be supported, such that an XSLT function can return
>an object of complex type Foo.

Would you be happy if the XSLT WG went on to heed Kurt's second option and implemented all of XSD Schema?

Andrew Watt



XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, David . Pawson Thread RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Mark Seaborne
RE: [xsl] prevent linebreaks, Jarno . Elovirta Date [xsl] An interesting angle on types, Andrew Watt
Month