Subject: Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:50:19 CET |
> > This is perhaps not the best example I can think of, but it does illustrate > the point I think it was fine enough, in discussions of this sort it is often best to have some code to see what someone is driving at, though pseudocode would have been good enough - not that I want to limit your fun. I agree we should be able to handle the complex types if we're gonna be forced to deal with typing at all. As an aside: One thing I would want is the possibility to pass the appinfo of a complex type as a nodeset to my stylesheet. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Kurt Cagle - Olywa | Thread | [xsl] Should be simple?, Cross, Neal - Develo |
RE: [xsl] Xpath and for-each loopin, Ragulf Pickaxe | Date | RE: [xsl] Getting encoding error on, Américo Albuquerque |
Month |