At 10:19 23/05/2003 +0100, you wrote:
In my view that is too sweeping an assertion and potentially misleading.
W3C Working Groups vary significantly in what they do or don't publish.
Factors such as the level of support from on high in W3C, likely renewal of
Charter, personality of Chairman and members etc etc seem to play a part.
... Oh yes, and how often certain members of the community gently request
that the Charter be made public. :) ..... Some WGs are quite "closed" and
unresponsive. Others are highly interactive with the user community.
The kind of interaction that you and Jeni provide on this list and that
Chris Lilley, Jon Ferraiolo and Dean Jackson have provided on
SVG-Developers are excellent examples of how W3C WG members can interact
with the relevant community.
Many Working Groups publish their Charter, which gives some high level
indication of what the group is supposed to achieve and the timetable they
are supposed to achieve it in. The Charter might satisfy at least some of
Frederic's questions. The XSLT/XPath/XQuery triumvirate don't seem to have
published their Charter. I guess I should ask about that on public-qt-comments.
The SVG WG, for example, publishes a Roadmap (see
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Roadmap.html). In practice, due a host of
factors, a roadmap is often a very approximate timetable. Some would say
such a timetable is more honoured in the breach. :)
Also, from time to time a WG will publish a Requirements document that
transcends several versions. See for example the SVG Requirements document
for versions 1.1, 1.2 and 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2Reqs/
Such roadmaps and multi-version requirements documents are obviously not
always possible. But they can be very useful to the developer community as
an indication of where a WG intends to take a technology.
The answer to the question is no. W3C working groups don't publish
In fact they don't have any. When a spec goes to last call, the
time taken to get to candidate Rec depends entirely on the number of
comments received. When it does to candidate Rec, the time takes to get
to Rec status depend on how long it takes implementors to come up with
implementations and test suites that demonstrate interoperability. "It
takes as long as it takes."
The uncertainties you describe are undoubtedly real. Yet it doesn't prevent
some groups putting forward publicly quite detailed plans, even if those
who read them need to be aware of the uncertainties you mention, and others.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Frédéric Laurent
> Sent: 23 May 2003 08:45
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] XSLT 2/XPath 2 roadmap
> Is there a roadmap available for the both specifications ?
> The following question in the public comment list has no
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list