RE: [xsl] setting an URIResolver - who is correct, saxon or xalan

["Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>]

In my view the spec is ambiguous in this area. The spec for
setURIResolver() on the TransformerFactory says that the URIResolver is
used for xsl:import and xsl:include; the spec for getURIResolver()
implies that it is also used for the document() function.

I have asked for the spec to be clarified in this area and I believe
that Sun are aware of the problem.

Meanwhile, setting the URIResolver on both the TransformerFactory and
the Transformer should work with every processor.

Michael Kay


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Robert Koberg
> Sent: 31 May 2003 16:32
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: resin-interest@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] setting an URIResolver - who is correct, saxon or xalan
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just figured out why I am having problems switching between 
> XSL processors, namely Xalan, Saxon and the Resin servlet 
> container's own Impl.
> 
> With Saxon I can set the URIResolver once on the 
> TransformerFactory and it is also used by the Transformer.
> 
> But with Xalan, I need to set the URIResolver on both the 
> TransformerFactory and the Transformer. 
> 
> I haven't tested Resin yet, but I would bet is the same as Xalan.
> 
> I can see benefits to both approaches, but I would hope for 
> standard way to do it. I will set them both, which works in 
> Saxon regardless. It seems correct to me that the Transformer 
> should inherit it's factory's resolver. It seems overkill to 
> set it twice since the transformer comes from the factory.
> 
> Have I simply stumbled on a Saxon 'feature' but really been 
> doing it wrong all this time?
> 
> Who is right? Or if there is no right way, what are your thoughts?
> 
> Best,
> -Rob
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list