Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: "Claudio Russo" <crusso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:02:46 -0300 |
Rob, Do you think it's so powerful per se to put at a side languages like Java, VB, C++ or Cobol for Data Management, when most of the current data architectures are RDB or VSAM? Don't you think it should be better considered as a next step processing for presentation purposes? Claudio. -----Original Message----- From: Rob Rohan [mailto:me@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Jueves, 03 de Julio de 2003 01:00 p.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step > Now, from the msgs I see on the list I see that people pretend to use > XSLT for whatever they figure out (maybe also for cooking). About 10% of the projects I have used xslt in have been for presentation. XSLT, to me, has nothing to do with presentation per se. I use it to take XML and change its form to whatever is needed. I think there are 2 rather distinct forms of XML - data centric and document centric - and XSLT can transform both kinds. I think you would be doing yourself a disservice to think that XSLT is somehow tied at the hip with presentation. It may have started that way, but I am not sure that is the future of the language. Cheers, Rob -- Rob Rohan <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Claudio Russo |
Month |