Subject: RE: [xsl] Automatically copying an element's attributes and their values From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:12:36 +0100 |
> > <ns0:acronym> > <xsl:copy-of select="@*"/> > > is a recoverabvle error as there is already a (white) text > node child of > <ns0:acronym> added to the result so you can no longer add attributes. > Yes - thanks - that's the explanation. I'm interested in people's views on "recoverable errors". In the case of errors like this that are clearly under the control of the stylesheet author, should we be making them non-recoverable (fatal) errors? Most of the new run-time error conditions in XSLT 2.0 are non-recoverable, but the old 1.0 ones haven't changed much. I think the original reasoning was that with client-side transformations in particular, it's better to put anything on the screen rather than a syntax error message. Does anyone think that's a valid argument? Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Automatically copying an , David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Automatically copying an , Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] Automatically copying an , Mary McRae | Date | [xsl] Re: following-sibling on attr, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |