Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Tool From: "Kienle, Steven C [USCRE/0924]" <steven.c.kienle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:15:50 -0500 |
If your users will be processing the XSLT on their computers and you have no control over those workstations, you should not expect anything more than XSLT 1.0. Also, you should test the code on as many possible XSLT processors as you can. Steve -----Original Message----- From: kakridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kakridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:15 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Tool Ed, to be honest, I'm not positive I have to use MSXML. My company is developing asp.net. I am creating html reports from XML that is generated from out .net apps. We have clients that will be using the Stylesheet and even altering them. Can I used Saxon? What is the benefit? How different would setup be for our clients if we used Saxon as opposed to MSXML? This communication is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately and delete it from his or her computer. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL Tool, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL Tool, kakridge |
RE: [xsl] Finding total hours betwe, kakridge | Date | [xsl] FOP Fonts, Skwirel Software Ltd |
Month |