Subject: [xsl] naming conventions for modular XSLT From: Harold Putman <h.putman@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:51:00 -0800 (PST) |
Hi, I am starting to break up my large XSLT into separate modules using xsl:include. It seems like I should have a way to indicate in my XSLT where the templates and variables come from if they are not in the same file. Is there a convention for doing this? I am trying out using a dot in the names of things that come from extern modules. That is: main.xsl includes util.xsl. In util.xsl I name everything that I intend to "export" with a name beginning with util. Then in my main.xsl I have ... Has anyone else done things like this? Is there any downside to doing it this way? Thanks, Harold Putman XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL to PDF - Overlayed gr, J.Pietschmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] naming conventions for mo, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSL to PDF - Overlayed gr, J.Pietschmann | Date | RE: [xsl] Lookup efficiency in XALA, JWolpert |
Month |