Subject: RE: [xsl] naming conventions for modular XSLT From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:18:17 -0000 |
XQuery insists on associating a namespace with the functions and variables exported by each module. If you want to be disciplined, then I don't think that's a bad discipline to follow. It's certainly more sensible to use namespaces than to use naming conventions of your own invention. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Harold Putman > Sent: 21 November 2003 19:51 > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] naming conventions for modular XSLT > > > Hi, > I am starting to break up my large XSLT into separate modules > using xsl:include. It seems like I should have a way to > indicate in my XSLT where the templates and variables come > from if they are not in the same file. Is there a convention > for doing this? > I am trying out using a dot in the names of things that come > from extern modules. That is: main.xsl includes util.xsl. > In util.xsl I name everything that I intend to "export" with > a name beginning with util. > > > > > Then in my main.xsl I have > > ... > > > > Has anyone else done things like this? Is there any downside > to doing it this way? > > Thanks, > > Harold Putman > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] naming conventions for modula, Harold Putman | Thread | Re: [xsl] naming conventions for mo, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] XSL Transformation in sec, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] naming conventions for mo, David Carlisle |
Month |