Subject: RE: [xsl] fo:list-block problem From: "Andreas L. Delmelle" <a_l.delmelle@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:41:48 +0100 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: G. Ken Holman > At 2003-12-15 17:38 +0100, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > <snip /> > >As a _cheat_ maybe, you could try specifying a really large > >provisional-space (based upon the largest @number in the > processed node-set) > >on the list-block itself, and using a negative start-indent for > the smaller > >@number-s... > > XSL-FO 1.0 Section 6.8.3 states that overlapping areas for the label and > body are an error. Hmmm... while, when you check the spec for the possible values for start-indent and end-indent, negatives _are_ allowed. Probably only useful then, when the list-item-label itself is also outdented... Oh well, thanks for the enlightenment! Cheers, Andreas XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] fo:list-block problem, G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] fo:list-block problem, G. Ken Holman |
RE: [xsl] fo:list-block problem, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] unparsed CDATA maintain H, Manolis Mavrikis |
Month |