Subject: Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl omision (was Re: [xsl] Looking up keys in a separate xml file) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:43:53 GMT |
I wrote > It has to either ignore the omit-xml-declaration, or ignore the > requested encoding, and to output using an encoding that doesn't require > a text declaration (utf8 or utf16) Actually although this is my experience of XSLT1 implementations, the XSLT1 spec is not so explicit on the behaviour in this case. However the XSLT2 drafts (which I've read more recently) are explicit: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xslt-xquery-serialization-20030502/#N400318 The omit-xml-declaration parameter should be ignored if the standalone parameter is present, or if the encoding parameter specifies a value other than UTF-8 or UTF-16. David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl, Andrew Welch |
[xsl] Order That Nodes Are Processe, Schwartz, Rechell R, | Date | Re: [xsl] Converting TabLibs into X, David Carlisle |
Month |