Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice

[bry@xxxxxxxxxx]

I moved from FOP to antennaHouse, I found 
that my only problems were tables (not 
surprising, and easy to fix) and situations 
where I had used lists to make a split box, 
like
content | matching content

which I found were hard to fix, i.e lots of 
trial and error.

> Von: Andrew Welch [mailto:AWelch@piper-
group.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Februar 2004 12:00
> An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [xsl] FO Processor choice
> 
> -----
> 
> Has anyone started out with FOP and then 
had to 'upgrade' to a
> commercial processor for any reason?  
Stability will be an issue, so
> DT's words are a little worrying.  What do 
Ken and DP think?  (your
> books are on order by the way :)
> 
> -----
> 
> We did in fact started out with FOP for a 
little science project (just plain PDF output
with little or no special needs at all). By 
now we're using XEP, because FOP crashed on
larger documents. The difference between 
both is very small when using them as command
line renderer (sorry, we didn't use server-
side transformations). Another problem is 
that
FOP's development seems to stall.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Maik Stührenberg
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 






 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list